Jury to consider if police could have done more to stop Zara Aleena’s killer
A second pre-inquest review has been held into the 35-year-old’s death.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A jury inquest will consider whether police officers could have done more to find Zara Aleena’s killer before he murdered her, a coroner has directed.
Nadia Persaud said on Tuesday she will empanel a jury for the month-long inquest into Ms Aleena’s death.
The 35-year-old law graduate was attacked as she walked home from a night out in Ilford, East London, on June 26 2022.
Jordan McSweeney was jailed for life with a minimum term of 38 years at the Old Bailey in December 2022 for the “terrifying and ruthless” assault.
At a pre-inquest review hearing at East London Coroner’s Court in Walthamstow, Ms Persaud said: “I consider there is reason to suspect the MPS police officers could and should have done more to locate Mr McSweeney prior to his attack on Zara Aleena, and a jury should be empanelled to consider this question.
“I therefore direct that this inquest must be held with a jury.
“The inquest into the death of Zara Aleena will consider the actions of police officers and will also consider the actions of prison and probation staff.
“These are all agents of the state who play a role in keeping the public safe.”
The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 says an inquest must be held with a jury if a senior coroner has reason to suspect the death resulted from an act or omission of a police officer in the execution of their duty.
Ms Persaud said: “Acts or omissions of police officers who were tasked with recalling Mr McSweeney falls within the scope of this inquest.”
McSweeney was released on licence from prison on June 17 2022 and, after missing successive appointments, the Probation Service recalled him to prison on June 24 2022 — but police did not find him at the address he had given.
Ms Persaud said jurors will need to consider whether officers did enough to find him and “whether adequate steps were taken to obtain information from Mr McSweeney’s mother”.
Interested parties will include Ms Aleena’s family, the Probation Service, Metropolitan Police and Redbridge Council, Ms Persaud said.
In a report published in January, chief inspector of probation Justin Russell highlighted a catalogue of errors in the Probation Service’s handling of McSweeney which meant he was not treated as a high-risk offender when he should have been.
Article two inquests are enhanced hearings held in cases where the state or “its agents” have “failed to protect the deceased against a human threat or other risk”, CPS guidance says.
Ms Persaud said: “Having considered the further disclosure received to date and having considered the legal submissions from the interested persons, I direct that article two is engaged in this case so as to trigger the enhanced procedural obligation.”
Another pre-inquest review hearing is due to take place on March 4 and the inquest is listed for June 3-28 at the same court.