Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Duchess sues for damages over photos

Dean Nelson
Wednesday 16 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE DUCHESS of York and her 'financial adviser' John Bryan are claiming more than pounds 2m damages in the French courts following the publication of photographs showing the Duchess sunbathing topless at a villa in St Tropez, lawyers confirmed yesterday, writes Dean Nelson.

Paris Match magazine, the photographer Daniel Angeli, and the magazine's distributors NMPP are all accused of breaching French privacy law. Lawyers for the Duchess and Mr Bryan are claiming pounds 1.4m from Mr Angeli, pounds 600,000 from Paris Match and pounds 200,000 from NMPP.

The pounds 600,000 claim against the magazine is based on 5 francs (54p) damages for each of the 1.2 million copies distributed on 27 August.

A spokesman for Paris Match said he was surprised by the size of the claim and that the company would contest the action in court.

Mr Bryan tried to prevent publication of the photographs in France last month, but the judge ruled in favour of the magazine because the photographs had been published world-wide. But he did warn the magazine that it would run the risk of an action under the country's privacy laws.

Under French law, 'everyone has the right to respect for his private life', which means it is an offence to 'listen to, record or transmit, words spoken by a person in a private place without the consent of that person', or to publish 'a picture of a person in a private place without their consent.'

The scale of damages does not, however, mirror those for libel in Britain. When the actress Brigitte Bardot complained about being photographed in her underwear, she was awarded 1 franc (11p) because she had posed for similar photographs in the past.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in