Doubt cast over hearing of Raymond McCord Jr inquest
Belfast Coroner’s Court heard it is unlikely the inquest will be able to finish by the May 2024 deadline imposed by the Legacy Act.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Doubt has been expressed over whether an inquest into the death of a Belfast man in 1997 will be heard.
Raymond McCord Jr was killed by loyalist paramilitaries in November 1997, aged 22.
Members of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) in the Mount Vernon area of north Belfast are suspected as being involved in his death.
An inquest has never been heard into Mr McCord’s death.
Now his father, prominent victims campaigner Raymond McCord, said he fears an inquest set to open next year will not take place.
At Belfast Coroner’s Court on Friday, Mr Justice Stephen Fowler, who has been appointed a coroner in the case, heard arguments that given a May 2024 deadline for inquest set by the Government’s Legacy Act, it is unlikely it will be able to complete.
The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Bill, passed earlier this year, will stop inquests and court processes pertaining to Troubles offences that have not substantively completed their hearings by May 2024.
After that date, those cases will pass over to the new Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery.
Andrew Moriarty, acting for the next of kin, criticised the “glacial pace” at which he said police were preparing documentation for the case, even after the passing of the Legacy Act imposing the May 2024 deadline.
He described “effectively zero disclosure” as having been made.
“I am absolutely not blind to the amount of work that needs to be done, but it is an amount of work that has been known about for a particularly long period of time, it’s a bit like the crew of the Titanic looking at the iceberg and doing nothing about it – that’s the sense that one has in relation to the state parties in action,” he said.
He also pointed out that there are several legal challenges to the Legacy Act, as well as an indication from Opposition leader Sir Keir Starmer that the Act could be repealed.
“There is a strong school of thought that the Act will not survive, or will not survive in it’s totality, that’s something that cannot be ignored,” he said.
“There is this appalling vista whereby if the court took a certain decision today or next week, one can have a situation whereby all work is stopped, tools are downed and then at some point in time that all has to be resuscitated.”
He added: “There is no doubt that if work is to continue that the work will be punishing… but we do say that work should continue.”
Peter Coll, KC, acting for the Police Service of Northern Ireland, said the inquest will not, in all likelihood, be completed by May 2024, adding: “As the law stands at the moment, an inquest in that position would have to be, by law, closed by the coroner on that date”.
He said further resources for this inquest will mean those resources will not be available for other legacy inquests.
“Yes, if further resources were applied in this case, further work can be done… but one has to question the utility of that kind of approach and whether it makes a material difference in circumstances where, we respectfully say, it seems abundantly clear the size of the task at hand, even if you were to give extra resources to it, the case will not complete by May 1,” he said.
He added that there have been a large number of inquests managed to hearing or late stage of preparation for hearing.
“At the moment they are supporting 24 legacy inquests,” he said.
“Attempts have been made to bolster resourcing but it’s only right to acknowledge that the number of inquests actually listed in the next six months could perhaps be considered to be unprecedented in scale.”
Mr Coll said issues with resourcing were not only around money, but also about human expertise.
“In relation to subject matter experts, there is a limited pool of individuals,” he said.
“Trying to draw the limited resource that is currently available into this inquest, or a hypothetical inquest, has inevitable knock-on effects on other inquests.”
Mr Justice Fowler requested further detail about police resourcing.
Another preliminary hearing is set to take place later this month.
Speaking outside court, Mr McCord said: “Today in court I heard once again that the state isn’t ready to have an inquest into the murder of my son Raymond Jr.
“Twenty six years and a day after his murder, the PSNI still have not given the disclosure papers they were instructed by the court to provide to my legal team.
“Disgraceful and disgusting… my fight for justice continues irrespective of what the state agencies do or say. I’ll get there.”