Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Doctor admonished for unauthorised suppository

Liz Hunt
Friday 06 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A doctor who inserted a pain- relieving suppository into an unconscious female patient having teeth extracted has been found guilty of serious professional misconduct by the General Medical Council. He has been severely admonished.

The consultant anaesthetist, who has with 10 years experience of dental anaesthetics, was charged by the GMC with assault and failure to obtain informed consent.

The patient, 22, had signed a consent form agreeing to dental treatment for four teeth to be extracted, and knew a general anaesthetic was necessary.

However, she had not given specific consent to an anaesthetic or to the use of suppositories intended to relieve pain when she regained consciousness. Such lack of consent is not common practice in dental surgeries but not unusual in day surgery units orhospital in- patients. The woman and her husband were told about the suppository when she was in the recovery room.

The case came to light because the anaesthetist inadvertently inserted the suppository into the patient's vagina, rather than her rectal passage. Resulting symptoms made the woman suspect sexual assault and she reported the case to the police.

The police concluded no sexual assault had taken place, but a report was sent to the GMC.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in