D-notice committee's abolition is urged
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.STEWART PURVIS, editor-in- chief of ITN, called yesterday for the abolition of the D-Notice Committee, the voluntary system under which media and Government ensure national security is not endangered by the publication of sensitive information.
Mr Purvis, a member of the committee for the past year, said: 'The structure is more about limiting information than releasing information . . . the emphasis is hardly on more open government.'
He said government departments should publish their own guidelines to editors and answer queries direct from journalists and give guidance to the media. Mr Purvis was speaking at a seminar organised by the International Press Institute and attended by committee members and senior civil servants. The civil servants are concerned with updating the system's operation to take account of apparent moves towards more open government promised by John Major.
Sir Christopher France, Permanent Under-Secretary at the Ministry of Defence, said a substantial review of the system would begin next month.
Mr Purvis also questioned whether the government side was trying to extend the system into areas such as terrorism and drugs. Sir Clive said there was no intention to 'massively extend it into national security issues'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments