Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Democrat aims for literal point

Glenda Cooper
Saturday 21 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For the first time since the High Court declared it legal to be a Literal Democrat, a man will stand as the Literal Democrat Labor Tory candidate in a local by-election in Harrow.

Roy Edey, 69, is to stand in order to draw attention to "the farce over the European election in Devon where Richard Huggett was allowed to stand as a Literal Democrat".

The Liberal Democrats lost the Devon and East Plymouth election to the Conservatives last June by only 700 votes. Mr Huggett polled over 10,000 although he did not campaign or issue election literature.

The Liberal Democrats attempted to prove in the High court that Mr Huggett's nomination paper confused the voters and should not have been allowed to stand.

But Mr Justice Dyson and Mr Justice Forbes, while agreeing that "Literal Democrat" was confusing, ruled that Mr Huggett's candidature was perfectly legal. Under British electoral law, candidates have to identify themselves by name and home address. Thereis no mention that party must be included.

"It's ridiculous," said Mr Edey, a retired solicitor's managing clerk. "If anyone tried to pass themselves off as Harrod's, Mr Al Fayed would be down Chancery Lane with his lawyer. But anyone can pass themselves off when it comes to political parties."

Mr Edey decided put all three names in his latest description so as not confuse the Harrow electorate on 16 February. At the last election he stood against Sir Patrick Mayhew in Tunbridge Wells under the description Illegal Sunday Shopping Westlands Scandal party.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in