Decision to release arsonist 'disastrous'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A DECISION that released a disturbed woman back into the community and led to the death of an elderly woman was 'disastrous', a judge said yesterday.
Mr Justice Rougier said a mental health review tribunal's absolute discharge of Paula Bailey from Rampton Special Hospital in July 1990 was 'irresponsibility that I find breathtaking. It bears a heavy burden for what happened afterwards'.
In May 1992, Bailey, 60, set fire to her semi-sheltered accommodation on Oak Tree Lane estate, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire. Her neighbour Agnes Goodwin, 83, died in the blaze.
Since 1974, Bailey's convictions included criminal damage, arson and an attack on a 92-year-old woman. She was detained at Rampton several times - being periodically discharged and recalled - until her absolute discharge. At Nottingham Crown Court in May she was convicted of arson and manslaughter. Sentence was adjourned for reports.
The judge, sitting at the High Court in London yesterday, said Bailey was a 'continuing danger'. Sentencing her to life imprisonment and fixing the period to be spent as punishment at five years, he said: 'The time has come when we cannot take any more risks.'
The judge said he would have preferred to send Bailey to hospital as there was no prison which was suited to her 'troubled mind and needs'. But he could not do so at present. He expressed the 'strongest possible hope' that the Home Secretary would take steps to transfer her to hospital in the future.
Experts divided, page 8
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments