Fact checked: The false far-right claims that sparked riots in Southport and across UK

Misinformation is at the source of far-right riots across the country, but although those inaccuracies have been corrected, the demonstrations are still ongoing

Tom Watling
Saturday 03 August 2024 11:26 BST
Debunked: How did social media fuel the Southport rioters?

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

After three young girls were killed and a further eight children and two adults were injured at the start of this week, far-right riots have taken place across the country.

They started in Southport, near the scene of the crime, and by Wednesday they had moved down to Downing Street in London. At least 35 more protests are expected this weekend in cities throughout England, with further violence erupting in Sunderland on Friday night.

Dozens of police officers have already been injured, many of whom were hospitalised.

Sunderland police station set alight amid fresh UK riots on Friday night
Sunderland police station set alight amid fresh UK riots on Friday night (TeesPix)

But the source of anger driving these protesters - beyond their longstanding frustration with a system they believe is wrongly allowing migrants and Muslims into the United Kingdom - appears to be based on inaccurate information and conspiracy.

Even now, after the misinformation has been corrected, conspiracies remain about why the identity of the Southport suspect was initially withheld, as per British law. Others suggest more information is still being kept from the public.

False: The name of the suspect

Within hours of the attack, the supposed name of the attacker was posted on social media by a channel called @artemisfornow, which has 44k followers. The name they posted was "Ali Al-Shakati".

In reality, this name was completely made up. But as Merseyside Police initially declined to identify the suspect beyond his age - a legal requirement for minors suspected of crimes - certain sections of social media quickly republished the name.

On Thursday, the judge decided not to put reporting restrictions in place preventing the suspect’s name from being published.

It was not "Ali Al-Shakati". The teenager’s name is Axel Rudakubana.

Axel Rudakubana, pictured here in a younger school photo, has been charged over the stabbings
Axel Rudakubana, pictured here in a younger school photo, has been charged over the stabbings (Supplied)

False: The suspect is a Muslim

Before the fake name was published online, an account called Europe Invasion, known to publish Islamophobic and anti-immigrant content, posted on X, formerly Twitter, claiming that the suspect was “alleged to be a Muslim immigrant”.

Where the account got their information is unclear but their post was viewed more than six million times. And as the post was accruing views, crowds of far-right protesters were swelling in Southport, ready to charge the local mosques.

In truth, Axel Rudakubana was described by neighbours as a “quiet choir boy” who comes from a family that regularly attends a Christian church.

Fake: The suspect is an immigrant

The second half of the post from Europe Invasion proved equally untrue.

It was followed by additional spurious claims that the suspect had crossed the English Channel on a small boat, which were also entirely untrue.

Rudakubana was born in Cardiff and is a British citizen. The family later moved to a quiet cul-de-sac in Banks, Lancashire.

Court artist drawing of 17-year-old Rudakubana, centre, covering his face as he appeared in the dock at Liverpool Crown Court
Court artist drawing of 17-year-old Rudakubana, centre, covering his face as he appeared in the dock at Liverpool Crown Court (Elizabeth Cook/PA)

Fake: The police withheld information for dubious reasons

Nigel Farage MP posted a video on Monday questioning whether the “truth is being withheld” from the public regarding the identity of the suspect. That later sparked conspiracies that the suspect’s past was being hidden.

These conspiracies are untrue.

The reason Rudakubana was not initially named - and further details pertaining to his identity were not published - is because of reporting restrictions.

As is standard, police did not name the person they had in custody as they continued to question him and he had not yet been charged.

After the 17-year-old was charged, under British law a minor cannot be identified until a judge rules that the suspect can be named.

This is what happened during the hearing on Thursday. The recorder of Liverpool Andrew Menary KC ruled the defendant could be named, and did not put reporting restrictions in place.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in