Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Noel Clarke’s libel trial against the Guardian publisher due in March 2025

The 48-year-old is suing Guardian News and Media over a series of articles.

Jess Glass
Monday 15 July 2024 16:01 BST
Noel Clarke leaves the Royal Courts of Justice (Lucy North/PA)
Noel Clarke leaves the Royal Courts of Justice (Lucy North/PA) (PA Archive)

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

Actor Noel Clarke’s libel claim against the Guardian newspaper’s publisher is set to go to trial in 2025 for up to six weeks, the High Court has heard.

The 48-year-old is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over a series of articles, including one from April 2021 which said 20 women who knew Mr Clarke in a professional capacity had come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct.

In a statement at the time he “vehemently” denied “any sexual misconduct or criminal wrongdoing”.

The Doctor Who actor is bringing a libel and data protection claim against the publisher and is seeking £10 million in special damages, with further damages expected to be sought over loss of future earnings.

GNM is defending the claim on the grounds of truth and public interest.

At a preliminary hearing on Monday, lawyers for GNM said that the full trial of the claims is due to start in March 2025.

Ben Gallop, for the publisher, said in written submissions: “There are substantial disputes of fact which will require a full six-week trial to determine, at which the parties between them expect to call the oral evidence of around 45 witnesses.”

During a hearing in March, the High Court in London was told that some of the women who made the disputed allegations against Mr Clarke could give evidence.

In a judgment last year, Mr Justice Johnson said that seven of the articles “mean that there are strong grounds to believe that the claimant is guilty of various forms of sexual harassment” with the eighth meaning “grounds to investigate”.

The judge also ruled all of the articles could be defamatory, which had not been disputed by GNM over seven of the pieces.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in