Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Laurence Fox claims he was up for Batman and Succession roles before being accused of racist Tweets

The actor gave evidence at the High Court in London on Monday

Jess Glass
Monday 27 November 2023 17:10 GMT
āœ•
Close
Laurence Fox arrives at High Court in London for libel trial

Laurence Foxā€™s life was ā€œdestroyedā€ by ā€œhurtfulā€ racism allegations and was left unable to get a mortgage, the actor has told the High Court.

The Reclaim Party founder entered a witness box on the fourth day of a libel trial in London over an exchange on Twitter, now known as X, about a decision by Sainsburyā€™s to provide a safe space for black employees during Black History Month.

Mr Fox called for a boycott of the supermarket in October 2020 and was called ā€œa racistā€ by the drag artist Crystal, former Stonewall trustee Simon Blake and actress Nicola Thorp.

The 45-year-old actor subsequently labelled each of the trio a ā€œpaedophileā€, prompting the libel action by Mr Blake and the drag star, also known as Colin Seymour.

Mr Fox, who denies being a racist, is counter-suing the trio over their tweets and started his evidence in London on Monday morning.

Laurence Fox and friend arrive at the High Court last week
Laurence Fox and friend arrive at the High Court last week (PA)

In his written evidence, the actor said he was ā€œhorrifiedā€ when he saw he had been called a racist, which he later described as ā€œa career-ending word, and a reputation-destroying allegationā€.

He continued: ā€œIt was very hurtful, firstly as it is not true, and secondly because it was baseless. It felt as if the claimants had posted it to try and destroy me. I felt that one of the most important things I had in this world was my good name, and they were trying to ruin it.ā€

In a 24-page statement, the Lewis star ā€“ who said he does not consider himself to be a ā€œtraditionally handsome or hunkyā€ actor ā€“ claimed by 2020 he was earning Ā£500,000-Ā£600,000 per year from acting.

However, Mr Fox said his ā€œlife was destroyed by what they didā€, and that he had become a target.

The court heard that on two occasions after the claim against him was filed, faeces were posted through Mr Foxā€™s door.

He said his ex-wife Billie Piper was ā€œconcernedā€ that their two children were no longer safe in the house, adding: ā€œI thought she had every right to feel that way, every mother would be worried.ā€

The actor also said his professional life was ā€œirreparably harmed, if not destroyedā€, with the loss of his former acting agent Sue Latimer and a dramatic drop in his income.

Mr Fox said: ā€œWithout the prospect of work from her and the income from it, I couldnā€™t get a mortgage.

ā€œThe only income I earned at that point was from the Reclaim Party. To this day I havenā€™t bought a house. I only received one mortgage offer very recently, and it was far too high and wouldnā€™t have been worth my while to take it.ā€

Mr Fox later said he has faced similar issues to Nigel Farage being ā€œdebankedā€, with his bank ā€œregularly questioningā€ legitimate transactions and he claimed his car insurance premium increased by nearly Ā£9,000.

He added in his witness evidence he had a ā€œvibrant and busyā€ work life before the tweets and before Ms Latimer dropped him, he was asked to audition for roles in Batman and Succession, and ā€œmultiple other Netflix, Disney+ and HBO productionsā€.

He continued: ā€œItā€™s a source of incredible sadness to me that my skill set, which has been highly trained, used at great length over 23 or 24 years ā€“ itā€™s just been completely put away.ā€

Earlier in the trial, Lorna Skinner KC, representing Mr Blake, Mr Seymour and Ms Thorp, said the trio ā€œhonestly believed, and continue honestly to believe, that Mr Fox is a racistā€.

In written submissions, the barrister said Mr Fox ā€œhas made a number of highly controversial statements about raceā€, adding: ā€œIf and to the extent that Mr Fox has been harmed in his reputation, it is his own conduct and not the claimantsā€™ comments on it that caused that harm.ā€

In his evidence discussing his call for a boycott of Sainsburyā€™s, Mr Fox said the supermarket had been ā€œessentially emotionally blackmailing their customersā€ and that he has not shopped there since.

He continued: ā€œI felt that rather than genuinely trying to tackle racism, Sainsburyā€™s were trying to improve their own image, branding themselves as the anti-racist supermarket.

ā€œI see the phrase ā€˜safe spaceā€™ as just locally friendly language for discrimination by segregation, dividing people down the line of skin colour.ā€

Mr Fox added that he believes Black History Month is ā€œa grift, designed to make black people feel like theyā€™re in some way undervalued in our societyā€ and called the Black Lives Matter movement ā€œextremely divisiveā€.

Ms Skinner previously highlighted several of Mr Foxā€™s social media posts, including a June 2022 tweet of four pride flags arranged in the shape of a swastika.

ā€œSuch a disgusting post could only be made by a complete ignoramus or an intelligent racist with an agenda. Mr Fox is the latter,ā€ she said.

However, Mr Fox said he does not have a problem with people of different sexualities, adding: ā€œThe streets of London are covered with the pride flag, yet nobody is allowed to criticise it.

ā€œI was making the point that the only other flag in history that society was not allowed to criticise was the Nazi flag.

ā€œI am obviously a major advocate for free speech so do not believe it is right we should live in fear of being cancelled for disagreeing with a flag.ā€

The trial before Mrs Justice Collins Rice is due to conclude later this week with a decision expected at a later date.

PA

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in