EU court asked to protect media source
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The Independent and four other media groups will ask the European Court of Human Rights to protect journalists' sources after British judges ordered the disclosureof leaked documents to a Belgian brewer.
A High Court judge and three Court of Appeal judges have ruled that the papers, anonymously received by the media, should be handed over to Interbrew, an international company known for its Stella Artois and Becks beers.
In July, the brewers dropped their claim against the media, leaving the City's senior watchdog, the Financial Service Authority (FSA), to pursue the matter. In a joint submission to the Strasbourg court, The Independent, The Guardian, the Financial Times, The Times and Reuters, argue that the judgment is a breach of the right to freedom of expression. They claim it is not clear how the judges came to a conclusion that disclosure was "necessary in a democratic society".
The documents detailed a possible takeover bid by Interbrew for South African Breweries. Interbrew claimed they were "doctored" and that it was a "victim of manipulation" in a bid to mislead the stock market. A spokeswoman for the FSA said last night its investigation was continuing.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.