Court 'powerless' in child case: 'Deep concern' over Children Act as order is overturned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE COURT of Appeal expressed 'deep concern' about the Children Act yesterday after ruling that it had no power to prevent a man who allegedly molested his daughter from contacting her again.
The court's comments came as it overturned an earlier High Court order that the man could only see his family under supervision from Nottinghamshire County Council.
The man, who cannot be named, had allegedly abused his eldest daughter, now 17, and there were fears that the two younger daughters were also at risk, the court heard.
Nevertheless, Sir Stephen Brown, sitting with Lord Justice Hirst and Lord Justice Waite, said that the court was powerless to protect the children and was unable to force Nottinghamshire to do so. The council, in its original application, had failed to ask for a supervision order, and as a result, there was no legal basis for Mr Justice Ward's ruling in the High Court.
Sir Stephen, who described the case as an 'unhappy catalogue of errors', said the local authority should not shrink from taking measures to ensure the daughters were safe from abuse. It should either renew an application to put the children under supervision, or ask for them to be put in care.
However, the judges added: 'The court is deeply concerned at the absence of any power to direct this authority to take steps to protect the children. Unfortunately, as appears from this case, if a local authority doggedly resists taking the steps which are appropriate to the case of children at risk of suffering harm, it appears the court is powerless.'
Law report, page 9
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments