Change to corroboration rules will have ‘far-reaching consequences’ – law body
The ruling was made on October 30 by an historic nine-judge panel at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A landmark ruling on corroboration that could see more rape cases go to trial will have “far-reaching consequences,” a law body has warned.
On October 30, an historic nine-judge panel supported an appeal by Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain KC, who had called for a change to corroboration laws in the wake of two sexual offences trials that resulted in majority not proven verdicts.
The ruling means that statements made by victims during, or shortly after, a crime can provide a second source of evidence that the crime took place, and that the accused was responsible.
Previously, it was long-established law that two statements from the same person could not be used to corroborate each other.
Corroboration is painted by some as being a unique feature of Scotland’s criminal justice system, but we’re also the only jurisdiction that allows conviction by simple majority verdict
The Law Society of Scotland, which represents more than 13,000 Scottish solicitors, warned the ruling amounted to a “fundamental change” that would have “far-reaching consequences”.
Stuart Munro, convener of the Law Society’s criminal law committee, said: “This judgement from the Lord Justice General and his colleagues in the High Court is highly significant and is bound to have far-reaching consequences.
“While the basic rule that crimes have to be proved by corroborated evidence hasn’t changed, this decision, and others like it, show that the court’s view on what can amount to corroboration has shifted considerably.
“Many cases that were previously thought to have insufficient evidence will now be capable of being prosecuted.
“Corroboration is painted by some as being a unique feature of Scotland’s criminal justice system, but we’re also the only jurisdiction that allows conviction by simple majority verdict.
“We now have a fundamental change to our criminal justice system in an area where Parliament considered change but thought better of it.”
The ruling, at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, was earlier welcomed by the charity Rape Crisis Scotland, which supports victims of sexual violence.
Sandy Brindley, the charity’s chief executive, said: “This is a landmark judgment. Most reported rape cases never make it to court, and the most common reason given is lack of corroboration.
“This ruling removes a barrier to justice in sexual offence cases, meaning potentially more cases are able to make it to court.”