Court convicts anti-Nazi man: 'Holocaust hoax' writer was threatened
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AN ANTI-NAZI League supporter was yesterday found guilty of using threatening behaviour against David Irving, a revisionist historian who claims the Jewish Holocaust was a hoax.
Paul Heining, 24, from Brighton, East Sussex, denied the charge, claiming he was acting to prevent Mr Irving and British National Party activists from desecrating a Jewish cemetery.
Mr Irving told Brighton magistrates court that last December he had attended a meeting at the Royal Albion Hotel, Brighton. But Mr Heining and the Anti-Nazi League claimed the meeting was a front for the BNP and other far right-wing groups.
After the meeting, Mr Irving summoned his driver, claiming he feared for his safety, and left the hotel. A police officer at the scene, PC Karl Whicking, told the court: 'They (Anti-Nazi League members) started running after the car, carrying placards . . . Once the car had stopped at the traffic lights they surrounded the vehicle and began shouting . . . One or two started hitting the car with their placards.' Daniel Jerome, for the defence, suggested to Mr Irving that the meeting in the Albion Hotel was a front for far-right wing activists such as the BNP. Mr Irving denied it, but said the meeting may have been broadened to include 'the direction Britain was taking'.
Mr Jerome asked him whether members of the meeting had shouted 'Sieg Heil', and made Nazi salutes, out of the hotel windows towards the demonstrators.
'No. But I am aware of people being paid by the opposition to give Hitler salutes,' Mr Irving replied.
Claiming Mr Irving was on his way to a Jewish cemetery, Mr Jerome said: 'A person has the right to use reasonable force to prevent crime - Mr Irving was on his way to commit a criminal offence.'
The magistrates, however, ruled the defence should confine its questioning to events immediately surrounding the incident. After being refused an adjournment, Mr Jerome said he would not ask any further questions or call any witnesses because 'it would be hypocritical for the defence to take part in a trial in which it has no confidence'.
Mr Heining received a six- month conditional discharge.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments