Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cost of recession 'running at pounds 15bn a year'

Anthony Bevins
Monday 31 August 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE RECESSION has cost the economy at least pounds 15bn a year in lost output since 1990, according to figures issued by Gordon Brown, the shadow Chancellor, yesterday.

Mr Brown urged Norman Lamont, Chancellor of the Exchequer, to snatch the European initiative with a call for co-ordinated cuts in interest rates at this week's meeting of European economic and finance ministers in Bath.

The ministers are due to gather on Friday night for a full-day session at the city's assembly rooms on Saturday.

One of the items on the agenda will be 'the economic situation in the EC', which could include contingency plans for a No-vote in this month's French referendum on the Maastricht treaty, and the strains it would impose on European exchange rate mechanism (ERM) parities.

Any renewal of speculation against sterling this week will again be met with determined resistance from the Bank of England, using its reserves in an attempt to avert a damaging increase in domestic interest rates.

The pound faces a bumpy week ahead of the German Bundesbank meeting on Thursday. Sterling gained almost a pfennig against the Deutschmark in thin trading yesterday morning, but later closed in Paris just 0.16 pfennig higher at DM2.7889, still uncomfortably close to its ERM floor of DM2.7780. Trading in London was closed for the bank holiday.

Mr Brown backed up yesterday's call for interest rate cuts in the European Community with an analysis of the recession, showing that the United Kingdom had the worst record in the EC for growth, manufacturing and industrial production, and investment.

'Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has fallen 4.1 per cent below its peak in the second quarter of 1990, a fall of almost pounds 15bn a year, at 1985 prices, since the recession began,' he said.

But that annual figure could underestimate the cumulative loss in GDP output. The same analysis showed that there had been an overall loss of 11.5 per cent in GDP between the second quarter of 1990 and the first quarter of this year - worth more than pounds 41bn in terms of output at the 1985 prices on which the GDP index is based.

The latest official figures published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed that while UK output fell by 3.2 per cent between the second quarter of 1990 and the fourth quarter of last year, German GDP had risen by 3.6 per cent, and French and Italian GDP had increased by 2.2 per cent.

Mr Brown said manufacturing investment, which had been worth pounds 3,241m in the first quarter of 1990, was down to only pounds 2,333m by this summer - a fall of 28 per cent. 'These are the worst figures for investment collapse since 1932,' he added.

'It is now clear that the Government must press for co-ordinated action in Europe, backed by investment measures to expand the economy at home.'

Mr Brown continued: 'Britain has a unique responsibility in this matter, not only because it is in the weakest economic position, but also because it is the current president of the EC and has the power to take an initiative of this kind. It is up to the Chancellor of the Exchequer to do something about it.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in