Contract for Group 4 'led to job cuts'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE HOME Office has been accused of using the award of the prison escort contract to Group 4 to cut prison staff at four prisons, and force other prison officers to work unsocial hours, writes Colin Brown.
Robert Maclennan, the Liberal Democrat spokesman, protested about 'double dealing' by the Government in a letter to Kenneth Clarke, the Home Secretary, after it was confirmed that the complement at four prisons had been reduced.
Kenneth Baker, the former Home Secretary, said privatisation of the escort service would lead to prison officers being released for other duties for which they had been trained.
But the Government agency responsible for the prisons confirmed that Hull, Leicester and Lincoln prisons had each reduced its complement of officers by 20 and Moorland prison by 10.
Mr Maclennan said: 'This will appear to many to be double dealing by the Home Secretary. The staff in these prisons have now been forced into working more unsocial hours, stretching the regimes to breaking point.'
Group 4 has been criticised after a series of break-outs by prisoners in its custody.
The prisons agency denied that the award of the contract was connected to the reduction in the complement of officers at the four prisons.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments