Jury sworn in for civil case against Conor McGregor
The jury has been warned not to become ‘private detectives’ by Justice Alexander Owens.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A jury has been sworn at the High Court to hear a civil action for damages against Irish mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor and another man for the alleged sexual assault of a woman.
Justice Alexander Owens told the jury that the allegation is that, Nikita Ni Laimhin, a hair colourist, was sexually assaulted by Mr McGregor and another man on December 9 2018.
The judge said that it is alleged that the pair had “in effect raped her” on that date.
He told the jury that it is not a criminal case, but a civil action for assault.
The court heard that if it is proved, then it is a civil wrong and the plaintiff is entitled to compensation of damages.
The jury was told that they are judges of fact as to what happened and will have to draw a conclusion and it will be based on their decision.
Mr McGregor, wearing a white shirt and a blue suit, is attending the High Court in Dublin.
The action is expected to last around two weeks.
Justice Owens warned the jury not to become their own “private detective” and carry out their own independent research into the case.
“You make your decision and listen to the evidence and make your decision based on the evidence,” Justice Owens said.
“Anything that you hear or see about this trial, or anything about the circumstances of the trial that is not received in court, cannot be considered by you.”
He warned the jurors not to get into discussions with family members about the case when they return home in the evenings, and not to ascertain their opinions on evidence.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.