Ban violent passengers from future flights, MP says
Tory MP Gareth Johnson said violence on planes can cause distress and be costly for airlines.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Allowing courts to ban people who are violent on planes from future flights could help solve the “increasing” problem, the Commons has heard.
Conservative MP Gareth Johnson has proposed legislation which he said would see violent flyers receive bans similar to those used in other circumstances, such as for drink-drivers or football hooligans.
Introducing a 10-minute rule Bill, he told the Commons that while currently airlines can ban people from their own aircraft, they cannot inform other airlines about the passenger or seek a wider ban.
Mr Johnson (Dartford) said he had heard suggestions that banning alcohol could address the issue of violence on planes, but he told the House – to assenting murmurs from fellow MPs – that such a step was not the answer, and the vast majority of people can enjoy a drink without causing such problems.
We happily allow people who assault airline staff to get back on a plane without any power from the courts to stop this
His Aviation Banning Orders (Disruptive Passengers) Bill is scheduled to receive further scrutiny on November 24, but it is unlikely to become law without Government backing due to a lack of parliamentary time.
Mr Johnson told the Commons: “Violent incidents on aeroplanes are rare, but the problem is increasing.
“The confined nature of an aeroplane makes an out-of-control individual far more concerning than on any other mode of transport.”
He added: “We currently ban people from driving if a criminal offence is committed in a car. We ban people from football matches if they take part in hooliganism. We even ban people from being directors of companies.
“But we happily allow people who assault airline staff to get back on a plane without any power from the courts to stop this.”
He said the Bill would make provision for court orders to prohibit “disruptive passengers from flying”.
And while he did not make specific recommendations for how such orders might work, he said people should know that if they are violent on planes “then they will not be flying again for a good period of time”, in addition to any other punishment they may receive.
Some say the solution is to ban alcohol. I don't agree - 99.9% of people who enjoy a glass of wine or a beer at an airport or on a plane do so without causing any problems
“It can be terrifying for nervous flyers and deeply concerning for everyone on a plane,” he said, adding “cabin crew should not have to deal with such incidents, and they should be protected by this place when carrying out their duties”.
He went on: “Airlines can ban people from using their own company again, but they cannot share information about that person to other airlines.
“So letting the courts stop the worst offenders will not only protect cabin crew and passengers, but act as a deterrent to anyone tempted to be violent on a plane.
“Right now a person can be violent on a plane, be banned by that airline, and then straight away get on another airline’s plane and be violent again. That cannot be right.
“Some say the solution is to ban alcohol.
“I don’t agree – 99.9% of people who enjoy a glass of wine or a beer at an airport or on a plane do so without causing any problems. It is part of their holiday.
“It is the 0.1% of people we should target, and not the 99.9%. Alcohol can be a factor, but not always, so banning it is not the answer.”
He said the airline companies also want violent incidents to be stopped, saying they can endanger staff and, if the plane needs to be diverted, can cost an “enormous” amount of money and cause “considerable” inconvenience.