Spa pool at home of Captain Tom’s daughter ‘could be used for rehab sessions’
Hannah Ingram-Moore and her husband applied in 2021 for permission to build a Captain Tom Foundation Building at their Bedfordshire home.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Captain Sir Tom Moore’s daughter attended an appeal hearing against the demolition of a spa pool block at her home, as a representative said the facility could be used for rehabilitation sessions for the elderly.
Hannah Ingram-Moore and her husband Colin applied in 2021 for permission to build a Captain Tom Foundation Building in the grounds of their home in Marston Moretaine, Bedfordshire.
The L-shaped building was given the green light, but the planning authority refused a subsequent retrospective application in 2022 for a larger C-shaped building containing a spa pool.
Central Bedfordshire Council said in July that an enforcement notice requiring the demolition of the “now-unauthorised building” was issued.
An appeal against the demolition notice was made to the Planning Inspectorate.
Ms Ingram-Moore, her husband and their son Benji sat together behind their four representatives as inspector Diane Fleming, appointed by the Secretary of State, heard the appeal on Tuesday.
The family listened to proceedings in the council chamber of Central Bedfordshire Council in Chicksands, with Mr Ingram-Moore occasionally passing notes forward to his representatives.
Ms Ingram-Moore, sitting in the middle of the three, occasionally glanced at a tablet computer.
Inspector Ms Fleming said that, when the council issued a demolition notice in November 2022, the C-shaped building, on a disused tennis court, was “substantially complete”.
Chartered surveyor James Paynter, for the appellants, said the scheme had “evolved” to include the spa pool.
“It was felt that a larger building could provide this extra space for this extra facility going forward,” he said.
“The spa pool has the opportunity to offer rehabilitation sessions for elderly people in the area.
“They want to offer one-to-one sessions, only on a once or twice per week basis.
“They felt this extra limb to create a C-shape was needed to create this facility.”
Richard Proctor, planning enforcement team leader for Central Bedfordshire Council, said: “Yes, the tennis court wasn’t ideal but it was significantly less harmful than the building.
“The original building that was approved was because of public good outweighing harm.”
He added: “There hasn’t been any information provided to the council about the use of the spa.”
The inspector noted that the built structure includes a spa pool and “the council say if that balancing exercise was carried out again the balance would be different”.
A document supporting the initial planning application for an L-shaped building said it was to be used partly “in connection with the Captain Tom Foundation and its charitable objectives”.
Barrister Scott Stemp, for the appellants, said the C-shaped building is unfinished but will have the “appearance of a subservient building”.
He told Ms Fleming: “What you are realistically assessing is the difference between the consented scheme and the as-built scheme.”
Later in the meeting Mr Stemp said: “It’s not news to anybody that the (Captain Tom) foundation, it seems, is to be closed down following an investigation by the Charity Commission.”
He added that in future the foundation was “unlikely to exist”.
Around half a dozen neighbours attended the meeting, with one arguing that the building is “49% bigger than what was consented” and is close to his property, adding: “It’s very brutal.”
In a written appeal statement, Mr Ingram-Moore said the heights of the approved and built buildings “are the same”.
Mr Paynter said the building would also offer the “opportunity for people to meet on a coffee morning basis – that’s probably not going to be more than once a month, like a church opening up for a coffee morning for Macmillan”.
“There’s going to be the opportunity to open the garden – we’ve heard the garden will open once per year for a fete,” he said.
He added that there would also be space in the building for creating podcasts.
Mr Stemp said “memorabilia is going to be kept” at the building, but added: “I don’t think it’s ever been said it was intended to house all of the memorabilia there.”
The inspector indicated she would make a site visit, accompanied by representatives for the appellants and for the council.
A written decision is to be published at a later date, weeks after the one-day hearing.
Sir Tom raised £38.9 million for the NHS, including Gift Aid, by walking 100 laps of his garden before his 100th birthday at the height of the first national Covid-19 lockdown in April 2020.
He was knighted by the late Queen during a unique open-air ceremony at Windsor Castle in summer 2020.
He died in February 2021.