Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Claims over mercury in teeth denied

Celia Hall
Monday 11 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE controversy over mercury levels in dental amalgam broke out again last night following new claims over its safety, writes Celia Hall.

The BBC Panorama television programme, 'Poison in the Mouth', claimed new evidence showed that the metal used to fill back teeth, which is 50 per cent mercury, lodges in the brain and kidneys and can cause nerve damage.

But the allegations were refuted by the British Dental Association and the Department of Health.

Richard Ibetson, head of conservative dentistry at Eastman Dental Hospital in London, said: 'There is no doubt that amalgam does release small amounts of mercury. What is in dispute is the levels at which that might become a problem. I have seen no research that supports the idea that it is unsafe to fill teeth with amalgam. Without . . . hesitation I would have amalgam fillings.'

A Department of Health spokesman said the new evidence from Germany did not alter the position of the Committee on Toxicity, which advises the Government.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in