Child support rule could save 600m pounds: More lone parents to be helped by ex-partners
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE NUMBER of single parents receiving help from former partners with the cost of bringing up their children will double under the Child Support Agency, Peter Lilley, the Secretary of State for Social Security, told a press conference yesterday.
His comments came as the agency, which is responsible for assessing and collecting child maintenance, took on its first cases. Until now, payments have been set by the courts under a system that has been condemned as inconsistent and unfair. Less than 30 per cent of single mothers receive any maintenance from ex-partners.
Under the agency, 800,000 lone parents would receive financial support, twice as many as at present, Mr Lilley said. The Government hopes that this will save pounds 600m a year on its social security budget.
Ministers argue that regular maintenance will encourage unemployed single mothers who want to return to work. Unlike income support, which is withdrawn when women obtain employment, maintenance payments can be retained.
However, neither Mr Lilley nor Ros Hepplewhite, the agency's chief executive, were able to say how many women would be better off. Lawyers say most will not benefit at all because their income support will decrease as maintenance payments rise.
After the press conference, the agency released figures showing that 22,000 women refused to name the father of their children when interviewed by social security staff last year. Under the Child Support Act, women can be penalised if they refuse to identify their ex-partners without good reason.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments