Drop ‘archaic’ smoking status labels when it comes to lung cancer, charity says
The Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation said anyone can be affected by the disease.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Too much focus on smoking status when someone has lung cancer symptoms could lead to people not getting diagnosed as quickly as they should, a charity has warned.
Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation is calling for an end to “smoker” and “non-smoker” labels, claiming they can have a “direct impact” on the speed at which the illness is detected.
The charity claims smokers can be reluctant to get symptoms checked due to feelings of guilt or shame, while non-smokers may not be offered the relevant tests and checks to rule out cancer.
Liam did not fit the stereotypical lung cancer patient, he was young, non-smoker, not overweight and relatively fit
The campaign has been backed by the parents of a man whose lung cancer symptoms were put down to stress – because he did not smoke.
Gordon Handley, whose son Liam died in 2021, believes his status as a non-smoker “worked against” him and contributed to delays.
Liam Handley, from Glossop, suffered from anxiety and when he visited his GP with chest pains he was told these were caused by stress.
After nine months of worsening symptoms he was diagnosed in August 2020 with advanced lung cancer which had spread to his spine, liver and lymph nodes.
His mother Lynn said: “I don’t think lung cancer was ever considered.
“Liam did not fit the stereotypical lung cancer patient, he was young, non-smoker, not overweight and relatively fit.
“It certainly wasn’t in our heads, but it wasn’t in the GP’s either and herein lies the problem.”
Liam initially responded well to treatment, but started to get chest pains again in April 2021.
Scans showed his cancer was growing again and he died in October that year, aged 37.
The foundation estimates there are about 48,500 people diagnosed with lung cancer every year in the UK, with about a third of cases unrelated to smoking.
According to Mr Handley, the fact Liam was a non-smoker “clouded the doctors’ view”.
He said: “We can only think that the label of non-smoker worked against Liam.
“The fact that he didn’t smoke clouded the doctor’s view, so lung cancer was never considered. Now we’re left with so many questions and his children will grow up without their dad.”
Roy Castle chief executive Paula Chadwick added: “The sooner lung cancer is caught, the more treatment options – including curative treatment – a person has.
“So, when we hear a story like Liam’s, where there were clearly missed opportunities to diagnose earlier, it’s vital we understand what went wrong.”
The charity’s Let Go Of The Labels campaign is calling for an end to terms such as smoker and never-smoker when it comes to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Labels like ‘smoker’ and ‘never smoker’ can distort what’s really going on and stop people getting diagnosed earlier. It’s time to let go of these archaic labels. Lung cancer doesn’t see them and neither should we
“Lung cancer is still so intrinsically linked to smoking but the reality is anyone can get this disease, regardless of if they have smoked or not,” Ms Chadwick said.
“The more people we spoke to, the more we recognised that labels like smoker and non-smoker were having a direct impact on how quickly people were being diagnosed.
“If a person has smoked, they can feel more reluctant to seek help because they feel ashamed or guilty, or their symptoms are directly attributed to smoking.
“Meanwhile, if someone hasn’t smoked, they often aren’t referred as quickly for tests as they could have been because they don’t fit the idea of who we expect to have lung cancer.”
Dave Marcus, from Cheshire, was diagnosed with lung cancer in November 2021, when he was 54.
He had been suffering from a persistent cough, which he was aware can be a symptom of lung cancer, but thought it did not apply to him as a non-smoker.
When he was diagnosed, he had a 7.8cm tumour.
Mr Marcus, now 57, said: “It’s a sobering thought to think how close things got, and so much of that is down to the perception of lung cancer – or lack of understanding around this type of cancer.
“I was so focused on the fact that I had never smoked that I, unintentionally, ignored the clearest of warning signs – a persistent cough.
“It’s definitely time we stop thinking about lung cancer in this way. I am proof that it can happen to anyone and catching it early means there’s life after lung cancer.”
Ms Chadwick added: “We need to do everything we can to ensure everyone with lung cancer is diagnosed as quickly as possible.
“Labels like ‘smoker’ and ‘never smoker’ can distort what’s really going on and stop people getting diagnosed earlier.
“It’s time to let go of these archaic labels. Lung cancer doesn’t see them and neither should we.”