Cheaper justice plans welcomed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PLANS that could lead to the most radical reform of civil justice in England and Wales for 300 years were welcomed by the Law Society and the Bar Council yesterday.
Lord Woolf, who is heading a government inquiry into civil law reform, was quoted yesterday as saying that he wanted to make justice speedier and more affordable for ordinary people.
A spokesman for the Law Society, which represents 76,000 solicitors in England and Wales, said the society broadly supported anything which would cut the cost and delays of litigation.
A spokesman for the Bar Council, which represents 7,700 barristers in England and Wales, also supported the proposal, subject to the interests of justice being protected and an examination of the inquiry's recommendations. Lord Woolf told the Observer: 'We have a very good system of justice - but no one can afford it . . . It is very important that justice should be done, but if costs are prohibitive that itself is an injustice.'
He proposes creating procedural judges who will simplify civil actions and bring them under a single set of rules; transfer control of civil actions from the parties and lawyers to the courts; set a ceiling on costs at the outset; lay down a timetable for cases to be heard; appoint expert witnesses to help the courts make a ruling and seek to halt, or limit the scope of, a case by getting the parties to agree about fundamental points of disagreement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments