Chancellor has made an ‘historic mistake’ and families will suffer, says Labour
Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves accused Rishi Sunak of making ‘wrong choices’.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rachel Reeves has accused Rishi Sunak of “making an historic mistake” by failing to scrap a tax hike on jobs, warning families will “endure significant hardship” within days.
The shadow chancellor told MPs about “Alice In Sunak-land” and described it as a place where “nothing is quite as it seems”, as she criticised his spring statement for failing to help workers, pensioners and businesses.
Ms Reeves also branded Mr Sunak “Ted Heath with an Instagram account”, and suggested he had fallen short of meeting the expectations of his Tory predecessor Nigel Lawson, whose portrait is in the Chancellor’s No 11 office.
The Labour frontbencher said: “Perhaps the Chancellor has been taking inspiration from the characters of Alice In Wonderland – or should I say Alice In Sunak-land, because nothing here is quite as it seems either.
“It’s the sort of place where a Chancellor celebrates giving people £200 to help them with their spiralling energy bills before explaining he needs it all back.
“In Sunak-land, the Chancellor claims ‘I believe in lower taxes’ while at the same time hiking Alice’s national insurance contributions. So Alice asks the Chancellor ‘when did lower taxes mean higher taxes, has down really become the new up?’
“The Chancellor follows Humpty Dumpty’s advice and says ‘when I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less’.
“Alice knows that under the Conservatives, taxes are at their highest level in decades as a result of the policies of this very same Chancellor.”
Ms Reeves added: “As Alice climbs out of the rabbit hole to leave Sunak-land, she recalls the words of the white rabbit and concludes that perhaps the Chancellor’s reality is just different from yours.
“The actual reality is that this Chancellor’s failure to back a windfall tax and his stubborn desire to pursue a national insurance tax rise are the wrong choices.
“In eight days, people’s energy bills will be rising by 54%, two weeks today the Chancellor’s tax hike will start hitting working people and their employers.
“His national insurance tax rise was a bad idea last September and he’s admitted it’s an even worse one today.
“The Chancellor is making an historic mistake. Today was the day to scrap the tax rise on jobs, today was the day to bring forward a windfall tax, today was the day for the Chancellor to set out a plan to support British businesses.
“But, on the basis of the statement today and the misguided choices of this Chancellor, families and businesses will from now on endure significant hardship as a result.”
Conservative Mel Stride, who chairs the Treasury Select Committee, broadly welcomed the statement – including the 5p per litre fuel duty cut.
He added: “I, along with many others in this House, would like to have seen the national insurance increases for next year to have been scrapped in their entirety but I have to say the increase in the threshold (Mr Sunak) has announced today has been very significant indeed, and far more significant than I imagined that it would be.”
Mr Stride said the big question Mr Sunak would be asked, within the context of the fiscal targets, was whether he had “used enough of that headroom now as opposed to having it as hedge against the uncertainties of the future”.