Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chairman defends TV watchdog role

Rhys Williams,Media Correspondent
Friday 28 October 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Scrapping the Broadcasting Standards Council and the Broadcasting Complaints Commission would deprive the public of an independent voice in television and radio, the council's chairman warned yesterday.

In a robust defence of both watchdogs, Lady Howe told the Broadcasting Press Guild: 'An independent source of judgement is one of two things which are uniquely offered by the BCC and the BSC. The second is a responsibilty across the whole industry. In their absence, both would be lost. In an age when much is made of accountability to the consumer, the listeners and viewers should not be excluded.'

Both bodies have come in for criticism recently. The Government has proposed a merger, but others in the industry would like to see them abolished and their remit transferred to the Independent Television Commission, the commercial sector's regulator.

Lady Howe argued that council and commission members operated free of editorial responsibilities or regulatory duties which meant 'they have no wider concerns than the interests of the audience'.

She said that as 'lay people', members could 'sometimes see concerns which professionals overlook or lack the time to take account of. They are distanced from some prevailing orthodoxies'.

'Let the broadcasters get on with the business of broadcasting. Let their regulators regulate them. And let the voice of the audience, the consumer, be heard by both of them. That is where we come in.'

She was in favour, however, of a merger with the BCC, saying it would be 'simpler for complainants and strengthen the consumer's voice'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in