CBI chief attacks councils review
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
HOWARD DAVIES, director general of the CBI, has accused ministers of turning the review of local government into 'an exercise in bureaucratic job creation across the country'.
Mr Davies has written to John Gummer, Secretary of State for the Environment, to say he is 'appalled' by recent changes made by ministers to the policy guidance for the review.
Succumbing to pressure by district councils, Mr Gummer announced on 30 September that the review of the districts and counties should be speeded up. Where districts and counties agreed on changes themselves, 'this should be the most promising starting point', Mr Gummer said.
But he also said that the Local Government Commission for England, which is conducting the review, is now not 'precluded from recommending an option which would be marginally more expensive than the status quo'.
Mr Davies says in his letter, which he has copied to Michael Portillo, Chief Secretary to the Treasury: 'We have always suspected that local government reorganisation could turn out to be an expensive hobby for the Government. Our only comfort has been that the commission itself was not allowed to recommend more expensive options. Now that you have removed that restriction - and we are not remotely comforted by the word 'marginally' - this looks to be an exercise in bureaucratic job creation across the country.
'It seems quite astonishing that the Government should make such a change at a time when there is an obvious need to restrain the growth in public spending. We hope that, in the very short period you have allowed for consultation before making this guidance definitive, you will reconsider this change.'
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments