Cancer diagnosis delay 'due to cuts'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HOSPITAL cuts that led to a seven-month delay in diagnosing cancer in an elderly man were described yesterday as 'outrageous' by his MP, Chris Smith, writes Celia Hall.
Had 77-year-old Edward Peters' illness been diagnosed sooner, Mr Smith said, he 'would have a much better chance of recovery'.
Mr Peters was due to have surgery for prostate problems at the Whittington Hospital, north London, last October but his operation was cancelled. Cancer of the bladder was not diagnosed until April when he had been finally recalled by the hospital - in the new financial year.
Mr Smith, MP for Islington South, has taken the case to Virginia Bottomley, Secretary of State for Health. 'It is an outrageous situation. We are told that the money follows the patient but it seems that they ran out of money on their contract for prostate surgery,' he said.
Mr Peters has been told the cancer is aggressive and likely to spread.
Mike Yates, corporate services manager at the Whittington, said the case had been investigated. 'Discussing waiting times is not helpful. . . There were specific points that related to Mr Peters' case.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments