Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Call to boycott papers ignored: Tabloids leave voluntary control body as PR adviser says Princess will not be 'too upset' and advertisers carry on regardless

Andrew Gliniecki,Jon Clarke
Tuesday 09 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE advertising industry yesterday rejected calls to boycott the Daily Mirror and the Sunday Mirror.

The call came first from Lord McGregor and was echoed by Peter Brooke, Secretary of State for National Heritage, on BBC Radio 4's World At One yesterday.

The Advertising Association said that a boycott would threaten the principle that advertisers should not try to interfere with editorial content.

Two Mirror group advertisers, the Royal Automobile Club and Autoglass, a car windscreen replacement company, declared their intention to boycott the newspapers. But none of the companies in the top six list of advertisers for either the Sunday Mirror or its daily stablemate expressed an immediate intention of pulling out, when contacted by the Independent.

Household names such as Dixons - which spent pounds 5.7m with the daily title last year - MFI and Comet decided not to comment, or said they would reserve judgement until later in the week.

Mr Brooke's remarks were not heeded by the Central Office of Information, a government agency, which was the Sunday Mirror's fourth-largest advertiser over the past 12 months, having spent pounds 656,306. A spokesman for the COI said: 'We will continue advertising as normal.'

A spokesman for the Department of National Heritage said: 'Mr Brooke was outlining options available to people who want to show their disapproval. He does not control the COI and cannot decide what they should do.'

Jeffery Rose, chairman of the RAC, said his organisation was withdrawing its advertising because it did not condone 'this unwarranted intrusion' into the princess's private life.

Autoglass said it was dropping the Daily Mirror from its advertisement schedule for the foreseeable future, adding: 'It's important for our ads to be carried in papers people respect and admire.'

The Britannia Building Society accused the Mirror group of action that was 'sleazy and incredibly stupid', and said it was reviewing its advertising policy, although it was contractually committed to continue advertising for the next three weeks. Simon Craven, the company's corporate communications manager, said he would be writing to David Montgomery, Mirror Group Newspapers' chief executive, to express his displeasure.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in