Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bulger programmes come under attack

Maggie Brown
Friday 25 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

(First Edition)

TELEVISION treatment of the James Bulger case was criticised yesterday by the Broadcasting Standards Council, writes Maggie Brown.

The BBC's Public Eye programme, which mounted a special report for BBC 1 at 9.30pm after the case ended, was reprimanded for sensationalism, relying heavily on dramatised reconstructions 'frequently inappropriate for a real crime so dreadful it had captured the nation's imagination'.

BBC's use of music, slow-motion film and other techniques closer to suspense fiction 'did not contribute anything to the nation's understanding of the circumstances surrounding the case, and tended to sensationalise it'.

It says that the programme's shortcomings were increased by the use of very brief extracts from taped interviews between the police and boys, even though the words were spoken by actors. It requires the BBC to broadcast its findings. The BBC says the programme was made with in a rational perspective.

World in Action was censured for using the actual tapes of interviews with the accused boys. The BSC says this further violated the privacy of the families, already riven with guilt and misery.

Granada, which made the November by the ITV network, said care had been injuries suffered by James Bulger, and it did not believe that the programme added to the distress of the relatives.

The council also criticised The Impossoble Job, the Channel 4 Cutting Edge documentary on the former England football manager Graham Taylor, for its should perhaps have been screened later in the evening, the council said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in