Bowel cancer screening 'could save 3,500 lives': Fund seeks support for pounds 3m programme
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE DEPARTMENT of Health has promised early discussions on plans to screen men and women for one of the commonest cancers in a national programme that could save at least 3,500 lives a year.
If such a programme went ahead, it would make the first major impact in 50 years into deaths and illness from cancer of the bowel, the second most common cancer which kills 17,433 people a year in the UK, researchers say.
First, the Imperial Cancer Research Fund is seeking support to mount a pounds 3m test programme with 120,000 men and women aged 55 to 60, probably based on GP practices.
Half would be given the simple, painless rectal examination using a flexible scope called a sigmoidoscope. If any polyps or pre-cancers were then found in the sigmoid colon, the lowest part of the bowel, they would be removed there and then.
Dr Jack Cuzick, of the fund's department of mathematics, statistics and epidemiology, said that the test took about five minutes, or 10 if a polyp needed to be removed. It costs pounds 25 to pounds 50 per screening.
He estimated that a full national programme would cost pounds 30m compared to the cost of treating bowel cancer which is pounds 100m.
Dr Cuzick said that bowel cancer fulfilled the essential criteria for a national programme: the disease was common but treatable and there was a safe and effective test to detect it.
He said that bowel cancer affected about one in 20 people and, apart from a minority who had rare, inherited disease, it was mostly a condition of late middle and old age.
About 5 per cent of people screened will show signs that they may have serious disease and will need a further investigation.
The researchers, who have set out the case for a national sigmoidoscopy screening programme in tomorrow's edition of the Lancet, say that the method is more acceptable to the population than an alternative screening method which requires people to provide a faecal sample.
A spokesman for the Department of Health said that a joint meeting was being held shortly between the ICRF and the Medical Research Council to 'address the whole issue to the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments