MPs want ex-ministers to face legal action if they break ‘revolving door’ rules
The terms governing ministers’ employment prospects on leaving their Whitehall roles should be expanded, a parliamentary committee said.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Politicians should face legal action if they fall foul of the rules by abusing the “revolving door” between Government and private sector jobs, MPs said.
The terms governing ministers’ employment prospects on leaving their Whitehall roles should be expanded to act as a “sufficient deterrent” to improper conduct, as part of a drive to safeguard the “integrity” of public life, according to a parliamentary committee.
The MPs are also calling for the Government’s ethics watchdogs to be given legal status, as they warned the Home Secretary’s resurrection in her Cabinet role just days after she was forced out for a security breach set a “dangerous precedent” for the enforcement of the ministerial code.
In a new report, the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) has made a series of recommendations to toughen Whitehall’s standards and ethics system in the wake of “damaging” scandals such as the Greensill and Partygate rows.
These include an expansion of the business appointment rules, which are enshrined in the ministerial and Civil Service management codes and determine which jobs ministers and senior officials can take up after leaving office.
It is incumbent on the Government to ensure a robust and effective system for upholding standards in public life is put in place, with proper sanctions for those who break the rules
As it stands, these politicians and civil servants must apply to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) before accepting any employment for two years following their exit, and are banned from lobbying Government for the same period.
But rare rule-breaking currently attracts “only negative publicity at worst”, the MPs warned.
In 2018, Boris Johnson was sharply criticised following his resignation as foreign secretary for resuming his column with The Daily Telegraph without clearing it with Acoba.
There have since been calls for the rules to be tightened in the wake of former prime minister David Cameron’s involvement in lobbying ministers and officials on behalf of the failed finance company Greensill Capital.
Mr Cameron’s actions were deemed permissible as he only became involved with the firm after he had been out of Government for more than two years.
By making the business appointment rules legally enforceable, the MPs said breaches could be pursued through the courts.
The PACAC said it has been told ministers are exploring “contractual mechanisms” to this end, and called for more detail on the form this will take and the sanctions that will apply, as well as a timeline for implementation.
The MPs also want a greater role for select committees, including endorsing appointments for the chairmen and women of ethics watchdogs, and requiring a minister to provide an explanation in a public hearing if they choose to ignore the advice of a recruitment panel.
We are already taking action to improve the effectiveness of the business appointment rules
PACAC chairman William Wragg said: “It is incumbent on the Government to ensure a robust and effective system for upholding standards in public life is put in place, with proper sanctions for those who break the rules.
“Our inquiry has found that, although we have a sophisticated landscape of ethics watchdogs in the UK to safeguard standards in public life, they lack the power to enforce the rules.
“The Prime Minister is rightly the ultimate arbiter of the rules in our system. We urge him to show leadership and give legal status to all the ethics watchdogs. This will provide a better deterrent for those who may be tempted to act improperly, and further safeguard the integrity of our public life.”
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: “We thank the committee for their report.
“We have been clear that this Government will have integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level and we are already taking action to improve the effectiveness of the business appointment rules.
“We will respond to the committee’s recommendations in due course.”