Wrong to change 1922 Committee rules in bid to oust PM, says Douglas Ross
The Scottish Conservative leader’s comments come despite him voting against the Prime Minister in a vote of confidence.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Douglas Ross has said the 1922 Committee rules should not be changed to allow a second confidence vote against Boris Johnson – despite his calls for the Prime Minister to resign.
The Prime Minister survived a confidence vote by 211 to 148 – with the Scottish Conservative leader amongst those voting for a change of leadership.
But calls for Mr Johnson to quit remain following two by-election defeats in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, and Tiverton and Honiton in Devon.
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen has outlined plans to stand for the 1922 Committee’s executive role later this week on a manifesto pledge to change the rules which would allow a second vote of confidence to be held.
Current rules state that confidence votes can only be held once a year.
I personally don't think we should change the rules midway through a process
But while Mr Ross is in favour of leadership change, he has said it would be “wrong” to change the rules.
Speaking on BBC’s Sunday Show, he said: “I’m a member of the 1922 Committee but I’m not on the executive committee and it is for the executive committee to look at rule changes.
“And clearly there is an election, I think, next week or the week after, and some candidates, their pitch is that they would change the rules.
“I personally don’t think we should change the rules midway through a process. I think that’s the wrong way to do it.
“But we saw with Theresa May, she lost a vote of the 1922 Committee and it didn’t take a rule change.
“She looked at the situation a few months on and she stepped down herself.”
But the Prime Minister has said he has no plans to resign.
Instead, he has said he is pushing to stay in power until around the mid-2030s.
Speaking in Kigali, Rwanda, Mr Johnson said: “At the moment I’m thinking actively about a third term and what could happen then, but I will review that when I get to it.”
Asked whether his party will lose the next general election if Mr Johnson remains leader, Mr Ross said he “was not looking at that”.
“We’ve got probably two or more years to go until the next general election,” he said.
“And the biggest issue for me is the priorities that the government, both here in Scotland and across the UK, should be focusing on which is the cost-of-living crisis and all of the issues that are facing our NHS, education, justice and local government.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.