Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Blackmail threatened to destroy charity'

Nick Walker
Friday 20 August 1993 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A RECLUSIVE millionaire broke down in court yesterday as he described how blackmail allegations could affect a children's charity he helped to found, writes Nick Walker.

An Old Bailey jury was told this week of allegations that Conrad Jameson, 60, of Sydney Place, Chelsea, south-west London, threatened to expose the businessman, referred to as Mr A, as having a collection of pornography and a chair designed for sexual purposes, and as having homosexual leanings.

Mr A, who cannot be named, said all the allegations behind the pounds 250,000 blackmail bid were 'absolutely false'. When asked what the effect would be on the charity if the allegations were published, Mr A said: 'Children who need this organisation have a very low opinion of adults . . . and if a child believed this organisation was headed by a person who was doing the sort of thing they needed help for, they wouldn't seek its help.'

Mr A told the court that he was not homosexual and did not possess any pornography. 'I have one Picasso . . , and there's one that's certainly erotic.' Members of the jury were shown two paintings - Picasso's Homme et Femme and a watercolour by 19th century French artist, Gavarni, depicting sexual acts - and also a 19th century chair from Mr A's home, probably used by a gynaecologist.

The trial continues.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in