Man accused of attempted murder of John Caldwell remanded in custody
The court heard that Alan Lundy made no reply to the accusations after being questioned for over seven hours.
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
A 44-year-old man charged with the attempted murder of detective chief inspector John Caldwell has been remanded in custody.
Alan Lundy, with an address at Flax Street, Belfast, appeared in Dungannon Magistrates Court on Saturday charged with attempted murder, directing terrorism and the preparation of terrorist acts.
The court heard that Lundy was questioned for seven hours and 44 minutes after being arrested on Thursday.
Mr Caldwell was seriously injured after he was shot several times in front of his son at a sports complex in Omagh, Co Tyrone, on February 22 2023.
The detective, who had investigated a number of high-profile murder cases, spent several weeks in intensive care.
The court heard that the prosecution was not arguing that Lundy was in or around Omagh on the evening of the attack on Mr Caldwell.
The court heard that “at no point was any explanation or comment made” when police put the accusations to Lundy.
The case instead relates to “his actions in the build-up” and “the chain of events” afterwards, and that he was the “conduit” between East Tyrone where the shooting took place and Belfast, where police said vehicles were sourced.
A defence solicitor for Lundy told the court that the prosecution’s evidence “is not sufficient to connect my client to the charges”.
“I would submit that police have created a narrative that’s not supported by any evidence that this court can rely on.”
Judge Michael Ranaghan said that it was a circumstantial case that could potentially involve a number of strands of evidence, including phone evidence, CCTV, police statements and “over and above that, a complete no-comment interview” with police.
The defendant’s solicitor said a bail application would be made at a later date as sureties needed to be prepared.
The judge said that any bail application he would consider compliance with conditions set by the court.
When the accused was asked by the judge whether he would sign the legal aid form, he made no reply.
At one point during proceedings, the judge was alerted to disturbances at the back of the court and asked everyone in court to stand up.
Three people who did not stand up were ordered to leave the courtroom.
When they did not leave, the judge then asked that they be removed and a person was heard asking a question.
He was asked to establish his identity and at the end of proceedings, the judge asked police to inform the man to appear before his court on Monday morning.
He said if he does not apologise in court then, a warrant will be issued, the judge said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.