Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Watership Down upgraded to PG rating after 45 years due to ‘violence, threat and bloody images’

The 1978 animated classic is among a number of titles to have had their age ratings raised

Naomi Clarke,Martha McHardy
Friday 21 July 2023 19:47 BST
Comments
Watership Down - Trailer (1978)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Watership Down has had its age rating raised from a U to a PG due to “mild violence, threat, brief bloody images and bad language”.

The 1978 animated film is among a number of titles to have had their age ratings raised, according to the British Board of Film Classifications’s (BBFC) annual report.

Watership Down tells the story of a colony of rabbits who seek out a safe place to set up a new warren after human developers threaten their community.

In the film, which is based on the novel by Richard Adams, the group meets a fellow rabbit called General Woundwort and a gull named Kehaar who uses an expletive when telling another character to go away.

The report referenced a “distressing sequence” in the film as one reason for the heightened rating, adding: “In their exile, the rabbits meet various challenges, some of which result in bloody bite and claw injuries caused by animals fighting.

“In one scene, a bird tells one of the rabbits to ‘piss off’.

“When we viewed the film under the current guidelines we reclassified it PG in line with our current policies for violence, threat, injury detail and language.”

PG is described as acceptable for “general viewing but some scenes may be unsuitable for young children”, to bring them in line with the current classification guidelines.

Star Trek: The Motion Picture, released in 1979, also had its age rating raised to PG after it was originally rated universal (U), meaning it is “suitable for all”.

The film, directed by Robert Wise and starring William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy, requires a PG for having “brief mild horror and sex references”.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free
Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free
‘Watership Down’
‘Watership Down’ (PA Media)

It was the first instalment of the film series spin-off based on the original TV show, which followed the adventures of the starship USS Enterprise and its crew.

A PG rating is needed for Watership Down due to “mild violence, threat, brief bloody images and bad language”.

The BBFC report later added: “Whenever a distributor resubmits a film with an existing BBFC rating to us, we review it under our current guidelines.

“This sometimes means we may reclassify the film at either a higher rating or a lower rating than it was under previous guidelines.”

After a film is resubmitted for classification, compliance officers for the BBFC will consider it against the current guidelines “to ensure BBFC classification decisions remain in step with societal standards”, the organisation has said.

Its guidelines are created through wide-scale consultations with thousands of people from across the UK, extensive research, and using the organisations’ experience.

Every four to five years, it updates the BBFC guidelines to “continue to meet the expectations and values of people across the UK”.

The next consultation is scheduled for this year, with any changes required by the research coming into force in early 2024.

In 2022, the BBFC classified 1,057 cinema films, 5,527 video submissions and 3,649 online submissions, the report states.

It found the age rating of 15 was the most common category for both online and physical media submissions, with 42% of all classified content in 2022 falling into the area.

‘Watership Down’ author Richard Adams in 1975
‘Watership Down’ author Richard Adams in 1975 (Rex)

As of this month, the British classification body has licensed 33 brands and services to carry its age ratings and data including streaming giants Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV+.

David Austin, chief executive of the BBFC, said: “Last year was a landmark year for the BBFC.

“We reached 110 years of classification and our iconic age ratings celebrated significant anniversaries.

“We also continued to cement our partnerships with VoD (Video on demand) services – and our recently announced AI projects, which explore how new technology might be integrated into the compliance process, aim to deliver scale and enhanced efficiencies for our customers and the wider industry.

“I’m really excited about the opportunities this next chapter will bring.”

Natasha Kaplinksy, president of the board, said: “I’ve always used the BBFC for guidance for myself and my family, so I was delighted to join the organisation as president in 2022.

“It’s an exciting time to be part of the BBFC, as we’re currently consulting with over 10,000 people across the UK to explore how audience expectations are evolving.

“We will then reflect these changes in our classification guidelines, which set the foundation for all of our age rating decisions, including when older films are resubmitted and receive a new classification. I look forward to unveiling our findings in 2024.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in