Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bank's redundancy plan attacked

Barrie Clement
Monday 22 November 1993 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BARCLAYS Bank has come under fire over a plan to target largely female staff for compulsory redundancy if they have a high rate of sickness, writes Barrie Clement.

Absence rates will form a critical part of a points system under which the bank's management hopes to get rid of 'low-quality' employees at branch offices.

Barclays has already shed 13,500 staff out of a planned reduction of 18,000 by the end of 1995, but its management is now demanding 500 compulsory redundancies, mainly at branch offices in London, Kent and Sussex.

A spokeswoman for Barclays said there had been insufficient applications for voluntary severance.

The bank says that pregnancy-related illnesses will not be taken into account, and says it is consulting employee representatives about the proposals. However, the Banking Insurance and Finance Union argues that decisions over the cause of absence would be left largely to line managers, and describes the talks as a 'sham'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in