Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Asians changing names to help job prospects

Haydn Price
Monday 31 August 1992 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

UNEMPLOYED Asians in the Midlands are changing their names to make prospective employers believe they are white.

The young Asians, who fear that they will not be interviewed by racist employers, are changing their traditional Asian names, such as Davinder, Charanjit and Surinder, to the 'white-sounding' David, Charlie and Sara.

Balvinder Singh, of the Birmingham Council of Sikh Gurdwaras, an organisation which works closely with Indian teenagers, said: 'Some personnel managers don't want Asians and would prefer to employ whites and so young Asians are now modifying their names accordingly'.

Mr Singh, who is known by his work colleagues as Billy, added: 'The first stage of discrimination is the application form and these young Asians are desperate enough to change their names in order to obtain an interview.'

One Asian who amended his name is Shamash Dean Choudhry, now a financial consultant. He was 'advised to drop Choudhry as a surname when applying for a post with a large car dealership'.

Mr Choudhry admits that on his application form he 'pretended to be Irish' by calling himself Shamus Dean. 'It worked and I got an interview and ended up working there,' he said.

Research by the Policy Studies Institute shows that one-third of all employers surveyed rejected applications on the basis of name alone.

During the research, a number of employers were sent two identical forms, one with an English- sounding name and the other without. It was found that many employers only offered interviews to the applicant with an English- sounding name.

Mr Singh believes that if Asian unemployment continues to rise the practice will continue. Figures from the Department of Employment show that '25 per cent of the Pakistani and Bangladeshi community and 11 per cent of those of Indian background were unemployed'. This compares with 9 per cent of the white community.

The department's Employment Gazette said: 'People of ethnic minority origin were more likely to be unemployed than whites from the same age and sex groups. The highest unemployment was among the Pakistani, Bangladeshi and West Indian community.'

However, not all Asians approve of changing names. Mukesh Murria, chairman of the Birmingham Institute of Asian Businesses, dismisses the practice as 'immature'.

'For economic betterment, those who amend their names are misleading the community and disgracing their fellow countrymen . . . even if they get the job they will never regain the respect of the employer because they have already tried to mislead him.'

He argued that Asians should 'stand firm and try to prove to their own community that they are of worth, and that then will be able to prove to others that they are worthy of employment'.

Mr Murria's views are shared by the Commission for Racial Equality.

A commission spokeswoman said that, 'although we know employers do discriminate against ethnic minority applicants, to change one's name is, in effect, to collude with discriminatory practices and we would be against it'.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in