Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sacoolas elected not to give evidence after bid to shut out KC, Dunn family told

Anne Sacoolas’s evidence in Harry Dunn’s inquest was delayed twice after last-minute talks were held to attempt to secure her attendance.

Josh Payne
Thursday 13 June 2024 15:12 BST
Last-minute talks were held with Anne Sacoolas in an attempt to secure her attendance at the inquest for Harry Dunn (Elizabeth Cook/PA)
Last-minute talks were held with Anne Sacoolas in an attempt to secure her attendance at the inquest for Harry Dunn (Elizabeth Cook/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

The family of Harry Dunn were told Anne Sacoolas was willing to attend the inquest remotely provided their lawyer did not ask questions.

Sacoolas’s evidence was delayed twice during the inquest in Northampton, after eleventh hour talks were held to further invite her to attend.

The Dunn family were told that the 45-year-old could have potentially agreed to give live evidence, but only on the condition that questions came only from the coroner and not the family’s lawyer Patrick Gibbs KC.

Family spokesman Radd Seiger told the PA news agency the parents rejected the proposal.

This appeared to us to be yet another attempt to have Mrs Sacoolas do things in our justice system that suited her

Family spokesman Radd Seiger

Sacoolas left the country shortly after the crash which killed Mr Dunn outside RAF Croughton in August 2019 after diplomatic immunity was asserted on her behalf.

Speaking about the last-minute talks, Mr Seiger said: “What on earth were they thinking of?

“Who would seek to restrict a grieving family’s opportunity to understand how their son died in that way.

“This appeared to us to be yet another attempt to have Mrs Sacoolas do things in our justice system that suited her.

“As much as the family wanted to hear from her, they are principled people and believe in doing things according to the rules.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in