Anger over teaching changes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEW controversy is likely to break out over the national curriculum today as the results of an exercise to reduce its size by one fifth are announced, writes Fran Abrams.
While most teachers will be delighted by the extra freedom it provides - the equivalent of one day a week - the changes to the curriculum for sport, English and history are all likely to spark fierce debate.
Under the proposals, all pupils will have to play competitive sport until they are 16. Schools will be able to choose to offer team games or individual sports, such as tennis. Iain Sproat, the sports minister, will be unhappy; the proposals allow for just 70-80 minutes of physical education a week.
Controversy is also likely to surround the new English curriculum, with several members of the advisory group which drew it up expressing concern over the final result. The traditional 'phonics' method of teaching reading is given extra weight.
Anne Barnes, general secretary of the National Association for the Teaching of English, said: 'It is a nonsense document and it is an opportunity which has been missed to provide something exciting and interesting.'
History is also likely to prove controversial with traditionalists saying the new curriculum misses out many important events but most teachers arguing it is too Anglocentric.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments