Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Anger at 'private passport controls'

Heather Mills,Home Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 02 March 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MINISTERS were urged yesterday to reject proposals that could result in immigration services and police training and records being run by private firms.

Labour said the Home Office proposals, disclosed in the Independent as part of the Government's pounds 1.6bn 'market testing' programme, were so sensitive 'that they must remain the absolute responsibility of ministers'.

Alun Michael, Labour's home affairs spokesman, also suggested that the entire privatisation and contracting-out programme should be put on hold since the Government's own law officers had cast doubts on the legality of previous privatisation deals.

Advice from the Attorney General for England and Wales, and the Lord Advocate for Scotland, implies that contracts in Whitehall, the health service and local government could have broken European law and taxpayers may end up footing compensation bills amounting to millions of pounds.

In a move which could deter private companies from tendering for further contracts, they have advised ministers that it would be illegal to impose inferior conditions on public sector staff whose jobs are transferred to the private sector.

Unions and individuals have mounted legal actions, and some government departments have put 'market testing' plans on hold until the matter is resolved.

This week Mr Michael will be tabling a series of questions seeking clarification of Home Office proposals and assurances over accountability and security surrounding any further transfer of work into the private sector.

Harry Fletcher, representing the unions involved, said it was extraordinary that the legality of competitive tendering had not been resolved earlier.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in