Ministers considering extending period before tenants eligible for Right to Buy
The Government also said it was considering measures which would see social housing replaced on a one-for-one basis in future when sold.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers are mulling over extending the period before social housing tenants can buy their home under the Right to Buy scheme.
Angela Rayner also said she was considering a target to ensure social homes are replaced on a one-for-one basis in future when they are sold off to tenants, in a bid to tackle the housing crisis.
The Deputy Prime Minister insisted the Government was ākeeping the pathway to home ownership thereā while taking steps to address the supply of homes.
But the Tories accused Ms Rayner, who bought her council house through the Right to Buy scheme in 2007, of āpulling up the drawbridge on home ownershipā.
Under the measures being considered by the Government in a consultation, the current three-year eligibility period for tenants to apply for the Right to Buy scheme could be extended.
When social tenants are able to buy their home, they are offered it at a discount, but this must be repaid if they sell it on again within five years.
Ministers are considering whether this period should be extended to 10 years.
And in a bid to ensure a steady supply of social homes, Ms Raynerās Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said it was also considering whether there should be a target to replace homes on a āone-for-oneā basis when they are sold.
Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Ms Rayner said: āFor millions of people in the position I was once in, that first step into the secure social housing that changed my life has become a distant dream.
āToo many social homes have been sold off before they can be replaced, which has directly contributed to the worst housing crisis in living memory.
āWe cannot fix the crisis without addressing this issue ā itās like trying to fill a bath when the plugās not in.
āA fairer Right to Buy will help councils protect and increase their housing stock, while also keeping the pathway to home ownership there for those who otherwise might not have the opportunity to get on the housing ladder.ā
But the Tory front bench criticised the measures being considered by Ms Rayner.
Shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake said: āThe Right to Buy has helped millions into home ownership. It has given something back to families who worked hard, paid their rent and played by the rules.
āIt has allowed them to do up their home, change their front door, improve their garden ā without getting permission from the town hall. It has given people a sense of pride and ownership not just in their home, but in their street and neighbourhood.
āLabour are now pulling up the drawbridge on home ownership and limiting aspiration and social mobility.
āItās the height of hypocrisy for Angela Rayner to constrain the policy that helped her move onto and up the housing ladder.
āItās classic socialism, one rule for them, another for everyone else.ā