Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Aids vaccine is brought a step closer: Injecting HIV genes into patients' cells aims to stimulate body's immune system

 

Steve Connor
Friday 30 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A RADICAL new approach in medical science has brought the prospect of a vaccine against Aids a step closer.

Conventional vaccines rely on injecting the infective agent itself. The new 'genetic inoculation' technique relies on injecting genes of the Aids virus into the cells of the patient.

The idea, which is similar to gene therapy, is that the body will manufacture important bits of the virus that will stimulate the immune system to produce an effective defence against any future attack from HIV.

Researchers are also investigating methods of producing genetic vaccines against malaria, which is caused by a blood parasite, and cancerous tumours, which could be attacked by a type of genetic therapy.

Scientists in the United States believe the approach is more than a pipedream with the publication today in the science journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the first results of tests of a genetic vaccine on laboratory mice.

David Weiner, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania, said the results showed the approach was safe and capable of producing the 'right sort' of immunity. He emphasised, however, that there was a long way to go before declaring an effective Aids vaccine. 'We have only done the initial work. This is not an Aids vaccine.'

Traditional methods of making vaccines use either live viruses, which have been rendered harmless or 'attenuated', or viruses that have been killed yet retain important physical features which the immune system can recognise and produce effective antibodies against. The disadvantage of live, attentuated viruses is that there is always a possibility that they could revert to being harmful. With the Aids virus, which mutates rapidly and causes disease many years after infection, a live, attenuated virus is considered too dangerous to be used.

Most effort has therefore concentrated on using inactivated HIV, or bits of the virus's protein, as a vaccine. One of the many fears of this approach, however, is that such a vaccine would not generate the right sort of immunity because it does not behave like an infective agent.

Dr Weiner said the genetic vaccine he has tested has shown itself to be both safe and capable of generating an effective immune response - one where the all-important 'killer cells' of the immune system are mobilised into an attack.

The prototype vaccine itself is made from the genes of HIV that the virus uses to orchestrate the manufacture of its envelope proteins, which form its outer 'coat'. Dr Weiner and his colleagues injected the genetic material into laboratory mice. The animals then began to make viral proteins under the command of the genes. The results indicated the approach 'is a very important avenue of research', he said.

Dr Weiner said there were plans to take the research further with tests on monkeys. Clinical trials on humans could then be considered, but he could not say when this was likely.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in