Age limits urged on video games
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.VIDEO GAMES should have certificates that restrict the participation of under-age viewers, according to a child psychologist at Newcastle University, writes Martin Wroe.
Dr Neil Niven was speaking after newspaper allegations that Nightrap, the latest computer game from Sega which has pre- release sales of 75,000, involves five semi-naked women being tortured and murdered.
The game, which costs pounds 275, is unusual because it contains life-like graphic images of actresses created from computer- generated film samples. In Nightrap, monsters called Oggers take over a home and the player has to trap them before they attack the family.
Dr Niven said that because players of video games interacted with the game, it was more damaging than television or video violence.
Children might emulate the acts of aggression found in such games, although the chances of this would lessen in older children.
Sega was unrepentant. 'No one gets mutilated,' a spokesman said. 'All the characters, which include men as well as women, are decently dressed. Sega would never have anything to do with pornography.'
The Home Office said the game had not been drawn to its attention but that games were covered in the Obscene Publications Act and 'existing provisions of the law are adequate to catch the most extreme examples of these games'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments