Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Accident boy's parents fight for school cash

Wednesday 22 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE PARENTS of a nine-year-old boy who was injured when his father ran him over with a lawnmower are fighting for the money to keep him at a private school.

The High Court in London heard yesterday that in September 1988 the boy was playing in the family's garden near Pulborough, West Sussex, when his father accidentally reversed over him with a ride-on lawnmower.

Michael Kent, the family's counsel, said the boy's right leg was injured, his right big toe was amputated, and his genitals severed. The judge has said the boy should not be identified.

Mr Kent said the boy's injuries would require 'prolonged periodic treatment', interrupting his schooling. 'He has a need arising out of this accident which can only be met at a cost,' he said.

The boy had nominally sued his father over the accident, but Mr Kent said this was an insurance case in which liability had been admitted. However, the insurers were reluctant to pay for private school fees, insisting that the state sector could cater for the boy.

The court was adjourned.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in