Abroad: Prime Minister signs a petition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CONCERN about television violence is not confined to Britain - and, as in Britain, the impetus for reform can come from a single murdered child, writes Hugh Winsor.
In March 1991, Marie-Eve Lariviere, aged 11, was abducted, sexually assaulted and murdered while on an errand to a shop in a Montreal suburb. Her sister Virginie, 14, previously a fan of Terminator films, collected 1.3 million signatures for a petition against television violence.
She was invited to meet the Canadian Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney, who added his signature. And she gave graphic testimony to the all-party parliamentary committee set up in response to her petition. She decided to undertake her crusade, she said, as she stared at her sister's coffin and wondered why anyone could kill. 'What came to mind was all the violence on television. I thought that maybe people don't understand any more that death is real. I thought that maybe if all the violence and death stops on TV, maybe it will stop in real life.' An average child of her age has seen 18,000 television murders, she said.
Last week, the committee issued a preliminary report calling for controls on 'egregious forms of video/television violence'. It says such controls should be voluntary and backed by tax and other financial incentives to encourage production of non-violent programmes and tougher restrictions on imports of violent videos. It also wants a campaign to persuade parents to stop their children watching screen violence. But it proposes legislation to enforce controls if the voluntary approach fails.
This has led to protests from writers, producers and broadcasters. But the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation takes a different view. Last month, the corporation's chairman, Keith Spicer, said: 'The new ground we can break here is to recognise that gratuitous and glamorised violence on television is not primarily a free speech issue; it is a child-protection issue. Television brings violence home to our children in the most intimate, intrusive way.'
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments