14-year-olds better at maths than science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLDS are better at maths than science, according to the results of the pilot tests taken by secondary school children in the summer, writes Ngaio Crequer. About 80 per cent of state schools volunteered for the pilot tests and just over half of all fee-paying schools.
In science, 50 per cent of pupils were at level 4 - defined as a typical 11-year-old or below - and 26 per cent at or below level 3 - a typical 9-year-old. Thirty-four per cent of 14-year-olds reached or surpassed the targets for their age in maths, but only 15 per cent did so in science. At 14, girls did slightly better than boys in maths, but in science there was nothing between the sexes in standards.
There were also aspects of science or maths in which pupils did better. Forty per cent reached at least level 6 - the national target for a typical 14-year-old - in arithmetic, algebra and handling data. But less than 30 per cent got to the same level in using and applying mathematics and in shape and space. Children did better in biology than in chemistry or science investigation.
David Hart, chief executive of the National Association of Head Teachers, said that large numbers of children were being labelled as failures. 'But the evidence points clearly to weaknesses in the test.'
The first compulsory tests will be taken next year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments