Tunnel safety fears raised a year after fire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Channel tunnel safety measures are still causing concern one year on from the devastating freight shuttle train fire after which 30 lorry drivers needed hospital treatment, the Consumers' Association said yesterday.
The tunnel operator, Eurotunnel, has introduced additional measures and altered procedures following the fire on 18 November 1996. But the CA said that it was still worried about open-sided freight carriages, evacuation procedures and the non-segregation of passengers from cars on the shuttle trains.
Eurotunnel said it was confident the steps it had taken made the tunnel "even safer than it was before the fire". In May 1997, an official report from the Channel Tunnel Safety Authority made 36 recommendations after saying the fire had exposed "fundamental weaknesses" in safety systems. Yesterday, Eurotunnel said that most of the recommendations had been implemented.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments