TUC in pension-rights battle over pensions for part-timers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The TUC is expected to appeal against the rejection yesterday of claims for backdated pension benefits on behalf of 60,000 part-time workers, most of whom are women.
An industrial tribunal in Birmingham decided it would not be possible for them to claim any pension beyond the two-year limit already established. The total backdated award could amount to pounds 95m, according to the TUC.
The claims - submitted on behalf of part-timers in the NHS, banking, education, the local authority sector and the power supply industry - are now likely to go before the Employment Appeals Tribunal.
The judgment by the Birmingham tribunal also indicated that some of the cases might be "out of time".
While the tribunal argued that applications should have been submitted within six months of the end of the contract of employment in question, James Goudie, counsel for the TUC, said the relevant period was the six months after a key European Court judgment in September last year that employers who barred part-time workers from pension schemes could be guilty of indirect sex discrimination. Proceedings had been started within that period, he said.
John Monks, TUC general secretary, said: "The TUC is determined that employers should not be let off the hook for past discrimination."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments