Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

True stories from the Great Railway Disaster

A weekly chronicle of the absurdities of privatisation; No 91: so you want to go a couple of stops down the line?

Saturday 12 October 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jim Grozier discovered a bizarre anomaly on the Lewes-Seaford line recently. After going for a walk on the South Downs, he ended up at Newhaven Harbour station wanting to go to Southease two stops down the line, and waited for the train - but was shocked to see it thunder past without stopping. When the next one came, half an hour later, he found it did not stop at Southease. Consulting the timetable, he found that, on weekdays, one of the two daytime trains per hour stops at Newhaven Harbour and the other at Southease.

Bemused, he wrote to Network SouthCentral, the newly privatised company which runs the line. John Flower of customer relations told him that there had been reduced demand on the line and he was "sorry that the timetable appears complex" but "recently introduced contracts [with Railtrack] require us to pay for all stops made. Financial constraints have forced us to hone our flexibility and the current situation is one result".

Mr Grozier, who works in the rail industry, amused himself by trying to work out what the extra costs borne by Railtrack could possibly be if the trains stopped, and concluded that the extra electricity involved probably came to... 50p.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in