Tradition of barristers' wigs goes on trial
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BARRISTERS COULD lose the right to wear wigs in court, depending on the outcome of a review of the 18th-century custom launched yesterday.
The Bar Council is to take the unprecedented step of consulting barristers and the public as to whether wigs should go. The results will be given to the Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine of Lairg, who will decide whether to end the practice.
Jonathan Hirst QC, incoming chairman of the Bar, said yesterday that the consultation was part of efforts by barristers to "modernise the Bar".
Some barristers say the horsehair wig is uncomfortable and makes them look out of touch. Solicitor advocates - solicitors who have same rights of audience as barristers - say the fact they do not wear wigs puts them at a disadvantage with juries.
Mr Hirst, who is to replace Dan Brennan as Bar leader, suggested that change might not come soon. "Previous surveys have found strong public support for the wearing of wigs by barristers, especially in criminal courts," he said. "It adds dignity and solemnity to court proceedings."
A spokesman for the Lord Chancellor's Department said the Government would need to see strong support from the public and legal profession before it agreed to abolition. But the Law Society said it was time to act: "As solicitor advocates don't wear wigs, neither should barristers."
Mr Hirst, in his inaugural speech, promised to speed up BarDirect, which broadens access to barristers' services.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments